Stevej
New member
You are avoiding to stay in the conversation.Did I say it would be impossible to create software and coding where this could happen? No.
Difficult, but not impossible.
This theory could work if the provider was responsible for paying out the wins, or taking the losses for the game. But they're not. If you can provide me with any kind of reasonable explanation to how this would be implemented across every single casino that uses the same provider, with it consistently being in the benefit of all the casinos using said provider, I'll eat my words. You won't be able to do, because it is again, impossible.
I'm not assuming. I'm using the maths and applying your theories to the real world, where they just do not add up, at all.
Besides this, if your absolutely insane theory was correct, and they had managed to devise a way to keep the RTP in line with what is advertised whilst manipulating profits (mathematically impossible again, by the way, bur for arguments sake), this would clearly show that a game is not operating properly and the expected profit is way, way more than it should be.
Regulators look into this all the time. The vetting process allows them to be able to turn up unannounced, and ask for the books at any time, and see exactly what is happening. If the amount of profit being made was in excess of what was expected, they would be investigated. Not to mention that the code you keep referencing, but we can not see, is also thoroughly vetted for fairness.
But, I forgot that all regulators are also in on the game and corrupt, right?
I'm not admitting I'm wrong, because I'm not wrong. If you can prove to me that I'm wrong, I'll gladly hold my hands up. You've come up with an extremely wild theory that I've already shown the maths does not work for, you've not provided a scenario alongside proof that works. Just a wild theory.
--
Look man, you're really just grasping at straws at this point. You're not going to listen to any logic, rhyme, or reason, no matter what I say. You don't want to know. You could be sent to the Evo studios yourself to get whatever data you wanted to come to a conclusion, and you still wouldn't want to know.
It's no longer interesting for me to continue the conversation as nothing of value is being added, it's just becoming painful. If you want to believe that things are 'rigged', you're entitled to your belief. But I must strongly emphasise that it's your belief.
At least I've been able to back up my statements with the maths behind the game, knowledge of how the games operate, and something of substance that isn't simply a video of a game round with a strange result, or a 'data sample' collected over 14 days by one player that is never going to be accurate or relevant.
Peace out..![]()
You are the guy who doesn’t admit you’re wrong. I told a scenario where rigging would work without manipulating rtp while earlier you said it’s impossible. You were wrong: it is possible to rig without manipulating the rtp even though it is difficult. I also have many other really good reasons to rig live games. I can tell, sure.
In coding world there’s not a single thing we can’t do. Everything is possible.
You don’t have to take part of this conversation. It’s totally ok not to answer anymore. Peace!
Edit: Cool for Kim! So what slot and when did it happen? Links. Let’s calculate the probability for that.
Last edited by a moderator:
