casio
Active member
They have updated there consultation again. Basically as it stands, if not changed and approved in the Summer:
They are also looking to the irresponsible High Stake videos and the glamorising of gambling, for example almost all of a certain streamers videos are like this - were they directly sighted in the report?
https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/publication/documents/2020-03/gambling-marketing-advertising-effect-young-people-exec-summary.pdf
They are also looking to regulate the advertising and working along with the CAP CODE.
So certain streamers that have A MASSIVE WIN ON MOTZUMA ON A ****RARE**** high stake --- CAN ACTUALLY be held responsible for utter lies.
- Someone earning around 50k before tax a year can deposit around £120 a week
- Affiliated streaming is outright banned unless viewers are vetted each day to check they are not self-excluded
- Max stake applied to online remote gaming websites, like the FOBTS, no actual max has been discussed yet
Basically If you cannot screen the viewers to make sure they are not self excluded, and then manually check with the operator your promoting that day, you can't stream.The licence conditions also set additional controls on gambling advertising. These include provisions requiring that all inducements to gamble (such as free bets and bonuses) must be compliant with consumer law, that all reasonable steps must be taken to prevent direct marketing to self-excluded customers, that adverts must not be placed on piracy websites, and that operators are responsible for their marketing affiliates.
They are also looking to the irresponsible High Stake videos and the glamorising of gambling, for example almost all of a certain streamers videos are like this - were they directly sighted in the report?
In response to a major piece of research commissioned by GambleAware,[footnote 9] the Committee of Advertising Practice is now consulting on the content restrictions in the codes to ensure they reflect the latest evidence and provide appropriate protections for under 18s and vulnerable adults. This process is separate to the Gambling Act Review and will progress simultaneously.
https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/publication/documents/2020-03/gambling-marketing-advertising-effect-young-people-exec-summary.pdf
They are also looking to regulate the advertising and working along with the CAP CODE.
So certain streamers that have A MASSIVE WIN ON MOTZUMA ON A ****RARE**** high stake --- CAN ACTUALLY be held responsible for utter lies.