THIS IS WHY BLANCO IS RIGHT

[Sleipner84]

For example if you check the last 100 spins 

To cover a total of a 300 € bet.

Betting on 50€ on 5 would give a total of 45x
60€x100=6000
60€x45=2700
LOSS 3300 €

Betting on 150€ on 2 would give a total of 136x
150€x100=15000€
150€x136=20400€
PROFIT 5400 €

Or am I wrong?


 

 

[kapisevicius]

I hope you are just trolling dude.

Both strats (2-10-bonuses and 5-10-bonuses) are almost the same - it cannot be different since the RTP is almost the same (at least someone on Evo can't do math but I doubt that). That's what I like about that game - you can get as you want and there's not really a strat thats is bad because RTPs are equal on all options.

 

[kapisevicius]

unless*

you can play*

 

[dirtystack]

If it makes you €5400 profit at €150 Then it will make you €54 profit at €1.50

If you are going to speculate and formulate a strat then I suggest you try it at €1.50 

You will soon realise you are wrong.

 

[TG161]

Why this is even a discussion? Kim is 100% right

Simple example

1.000x1€ bet on a 96% RTP game

Expected outcome 960€ (40€ loss)

1.000x2€ bet on a 97% RTP game

Expected outcome 1.940€ (60€ loss)

Lets take this to the test

Crazy Time

5 RTP = 95.78%

2 RTP = 95.95%

We doing this with 1.000 spins

----

Kim strat 25€ on 5

25.000€ in total x 0.9595 = 23.987,50€

Loss of 1.012,5€

----

Blanco Strat 60€ on 2

60.000€ in total x 0.9578 = 57.468€

Loss of 2.532€