Net Ent are cancer!!!!

[Meowcat90]

Basically, unless you're prepared to cash out slight profits or play really high bets, you shouldn't play low volatility slot. Personally I would never cash out less than 5x initial deposit, making the low volatile games completely pointless. They are made to make you bleed out, while high volatile slots are made to either execute you or make you king. Bleeding is really frustrating in slots (as well as in real life, I guess), and Netent and Quickspin are the masters of bleed.

I would still like to know how you presume this RTP manipulation occurs without people knowing. Another thing about really low volatile games, is that they are really predictable. While BTG probably could lower RTP on Bonanza by 10% without people noticing for a long time (as max win is enormous and people are used to go broke quickly anyway), this would be much harder to conceal in a game like Starburst, where a few thousand spins usually would be enough to get an ok picture of the real RTP. This is starting to feel a lot like the "stars is rigged"- discussion, where no one is acknowledging the fact that there are people with millions upon millions of tracked hands in databases that should easily confirm that "aces never win" if this was the case. Numbers and proof is so much more interesting than a gut feeling.

 

[jchneo]

Basically, unless you're prepared to cash out slight profits or play really high bets, you shouldn't play low volatility slot. Personally I would never cash out less than 5x initial deposit, making the low volatile games completely pointless. They are made to make you bleed out, while high volatile slots are made to either execute you or make you king. Bleeding is really frustrating in slots (as well as in real life, I guess), and Netent and Quickspin are the masters of bleed.

I would still like to know how you presume this RTP manipulation occurs without people knowing. Another thing about really low volatile games, is that they are really predictable. While BTG probably could lower RTP on Bonanza by 10% without people noticing for a long time (as max win is enormous and people are used to go broke quickly anyway), this would be much harder to conceal in a game like Starburst, where a few thousand spins usually would be enough to get an ok picture of the real RTP. This is starting to feel a lot like the "stars is rigged"- discussion, where no one is acknowledging the fact that there are people with millions upon millions of tracked hands in databases that should easily confirm that "aces never win" if this was the case. Numbers and proof is so much more interesting than a gut feeling.

Try playing 1500 bonus rounds on Dead or Alive with a max win of 150x, they say a wildline occurs on average once every 150 bonuses, my fucking arse it does, how the fuck is it random when the damn thing is programmed!! THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS RANDOM IN A PIECE OF SOFTWARE PROGRAMMED BY A FUCKING HUMAN BEING!! RANDOM IS AN OUTCOME WITHOUT ANY INTERVENTION, A RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR IS NOT FUCKING RANDOM BECAUSE FOR ONE, THE NUMBERS ARE SELECTED FROM SEEDS, IF YOU PRE SET THESE SEEDS TO OFFER NOTHING BUT LOW WINS AND LOSSES, THEN THERE YOU GO, THEY PASS OFF THAT BULLSHIT AS RANDOM, BUT YOUR RANDOM SELECTION WAS IN AN EMPTY FUCKING JAR!

 

[Meowcat90]

Try playing 1500 bonus rounds on Dead or Alive with a max win of 150x, they say a wildline occurs on average once every 150 bonuses, my fucking arse it does, how the fuck is it random when the damn thing is programmed!! THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS RANDOM IN A PIECE OF SOFTWARE PROGRAMMED BY A FUCKING HUMAN BEING!! RANDOM IS AN OUTCOME WITHOUT ANY INTERVENTION, A RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR IS NOT FUCKING RANDOM BECAUSE FOR ONE, THE NUMBERS ARE SELECTED FROM SEEDS, IF YOU PRE SET THESE SEEDS TO OFFER NOTHING BUT LOW WINS AND LOSSES, THEN THERE YOU GO, THEY PASS OFF THAT BULLSHIT AS RANDOM, BUT YOUR RANDOM SELECTION WAS IN AN EMPTY FUCKING JAR!

If you've had 1500 bonus rounds with a max win of 150x, and also had 2300 spins without any bonus, that is interesting. The chance of 2300 spins without bonus should be somewhere along the lines of 1.8 in a million (the math could be a bit off, but the numbers are certainly extreme) , and the fact that you went crazy about Netent just days before this, makes it very suspect that this would happen now. I don't know the alleged chances of getting 150x+ in bonus, but even if it was as little as a 2% chance of 150x+, we're talking about 1 in tens of trillions chance of 1500 bonuses without it. I would love to see this documented. As it is, I do not believe you.  I believe you've had really bad runs on DOA, but I do not believe these numbers without documentation. If you could document this, I would myself spearhead a collective effort to investigate the game further, if people could provide me with their own extensive documented DOA sessions. Personally, if you could document both those claims, I would join you in your boycott without further proof. I am however very confident that you're lying, even if I would gladly be persuaded by reliable evidence.  Btw, caps lock makes things harder to read, not easier. 

 

[BoracicLint]

Cancer confirmed,600!spins on doa no bonus ,10c win from 25 free spins on aloha and then 300spins to get a bonus on jungle spirit with 60coins win \0/ just incredible

Probably the worst,in terms of returns,of the Netent slots to play. The reason DOA pays so much for wild lines and big bonuses occasionally is that its so difficult to win a good amount on. Jungle Spirit is garbage and Aloha is appalling unless played at at least 50p or £1 per spin. Try the better ones for RTP such as Jack and The Beanstalk,Guns n Roses or Gonzos Quest as these can plow through wagering requirements and hit a few big wins.