I agree on the toxic part.
This thread should be about shining a light on the way some casinos are creating an "easy out" for them selves by allowing players to play "non-allowed" games. I think almost all the writers in this post has mentioned this, but it gets a bit lost when personal stuff gets dragged in.
If communities have threads like this one and the overall message can be interpreted as "we are OK that some casinos operate this way" it is unlikely to inspire changes in the future. (I am not saying that this is the case, simply that it can be interpreted that way)
With more and more casinos offering many of the same games, the most successful ones should be the ones offering the safest terms for the players without many of the "traps" we can find today.
Just my own opinion on the subject