Slotplayer
Moderator
But according to some, the general viewing public doesn't watch our content so it is rather irrelevant?I dispute this as to someone who is not clued up about affiliates or the purpose of the stream it's not obvious. They may take it as just someone who is having a gamble and recording it so people can watch.
I fail to see how it's a bad thing to do it anyway. I believe it should be implemented and those against it are obviously trying to protect their income and deceive the viewers.
If you asked the general viewing public who watch such streams what the purpose of the streams are I can guarantee you that the majority would not say to advertise a casino.
I've had correspondence with the ASA (sent in a complaint) about this and await their response. One thing I do not understand is that some streamers/content creators have a huge 18 plus sign before the video starts with some responsible gambling disclaimer at the start of each video but some do not follow this. It's clear that some people are not sure what they need to do so submitting complaints to such bodies is helpful to determine what actually needs to be done anyway.
I do agree the terminology used in the statement you posted is confusing though.
In other words, you can't have it both ways. You can't say on one hand our streams are only watched by the addicts and the other hand by the general public.
As with all guidelines / regulations, most of the time they are subject to interpretation and I guess only when the ASA were to watch these streams, they can make an informed decision on it.
