G
Guest
Guest
So, wondered if @Big Time Gaming official could explain the maths behind these gambles. So many players losing regularly at 90+% from audience/phone lifelines. An explanation would be great.
That's a pretty easy one. If it shows 91% chance of winning, there's still 9% chance that you'll lose. Although 91% is quite high, it isn't 100% and people seem to "ignore" that, expecting to win at all times.So, wondered if @Big Time Gaming official could explain the maths behind these gambles. So many players losing regularly at 90+% from audience/phone lifelines. An explanation would be great.
I'm quite confident their mathematical model will not be as simple....it will have to account for RTP as well. As stated elsewhere 83% loses more than 60% for a lot of players. Also, when you walk away it always gives the highest percentage as the correct answer, never anything else. Perhaps they can clear it upThat's a pretty easy one. If it shows 91% chance of winning, there's still 9% chance that you'll lose. Although 91% is quite high, it isn't 100% and people seem to "ignore" that, expecting to win at all times.![]()
Well it's plain simple. I believe it is required for the provider that if it's shown to the player 91% - 9%, or 50% - 50%, it has to be true in order to obtain license in major markets such as UK. Not doing so wouldn't bring any benefit to the providers. Slots are designed to take roughly 6-4% of every bet made, there's no need to further "rigg" the slots so to say.I'm quite confident their mathematical model will not be as simple....it will have to account for RTP as well. As stated elsewhere 83% loses more than 60% for a lot of players. Also, when you walk away it always gives the highest percentage as the correct answer, never anything else. Perhaps they can clear it up
You kind of have that backwards. The RTP will take into account the gamble percentages. The RTP is not something that is set, it is something that is derived. You set up the game with the symbol frequencies on the reels, the payout sizes etc and then you run millions of simulations of the game playing and see what the RTP is. Then you modify your symbol frequencies and payout values if you need to move the RTP up or down. (you can also work out the RTP via mathematics, but that's very complicated, especially as games get more complicated. Most studio's will have a mathematician or two though for this reason).I'm quite confident their mathematical model will not be as simple....it will have to account for RTP as well. As stated elsewhere 83% loses more than 60% for a lot of players. Also, when you walk away it always gives the highest percentage as the correct answer, never anything else. Perhaps they can clear it up
If it shows 90% on A and 13% on C then I would contact the legal department ?I hate this game actually ?? so many times i get a bonus and start with 8 spins, and it shows 90% on example A and it's c who has 13% so annoying but ye i get it, they have to profit on it.
It's on my ban list with
Bonanza, meduza jammin jars and many others ?
??If it shows 90% on A and 13% on C then I would contact the legal department ?
Please extend your knowledge on this subject: theory of infinite numbers..So, wondered if @Big Time Gaming official could explain the maths behind these gambles. So many players losing regularly at 90+% from audience/phone lifelines. An explanation would be great.
If it shows 90% on A and 13% on C then that's 103% already without B and D involved hence contact the legal department for them scamming the hell out of you
Are the A B C D related? if not.If it shows 90% on A and 13% on C then that's 103% already without B and D involved hence contact the legal department for them scamming the hell out of you![]()
I suspect they weren't accurate numbers though
It's just a game bro, and obviously it's a mistake if this is true, do you have a screenshot of this to prove it?If it shows 90% on A and 13% on C then that's 103% already without B and D involved hence contact the legal department for them scamming the hell out of you![]()
I suspect they weren't accurate numbers though
Modnationx said:It's just a game bro, and obviously it's a mistake if this is true, do you have a screenshot of this to prove it?
In my honest opinion if they really wanted to scam someone it wouldn't be on a % mistake ? you wouldn't notice it if they really wanted to.
OkWhy would I have a screenshotYou were the one who said you had them percentages earlier in the thread ?
This email () is already in use and linked to your account. Please click Continue to link accounts or use your account.
Continue