Reactoonz

Status
Not open for further replies.

dirtystack

New member
Terrible prolonged run in this shit.

£20 000 gone on this game at £1-£5 bets, 90% of spins done on £2

5 Gargas -

highest was just over 750x at £2 just before Christmas.

other 4 were all below 50x

Not a single win over 50x without Garga(highest was 28x)

100 spins at £2 results in losing £140-160

Just in the last week have lost £2600 at £2 bets without a Garga.

It’s a guess but I’d estimate around 4000 spins since the last Garga, and about 4000 spins between that and the previous Garga.

If the sites have it; I always, after losing my balance, put the game on free play and it’s always 1 or 2 Garga within 100 spins or some 15 pink/green bullshit.

Something dodgy going on with this game.

Fuck PlaynGo, never playing a game of theirs again.

Rant over.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Funny to see regular members posting in other peoples rant/complaints about certain slots « Oh ITS just variance» , « ITS not rigged ITS just how its supposed to be». And then proccedd to post em themselves Kappa 

 
Well i have noticed the same thing last 2-3 months, after streamers have spammed that game for months i believe play and go have done something to tune down the winnings.

Before xmas i have had 750x and 1500x on every bet from 10€ too 100€, but last couple months i've gotten shit gargas under 60x even after playing for well over 50K€.

We are actually a couple of friends who are now recording 50000 spins on free game and 50000 spins on real money game to compare wins, gargas, x-wins, unstabilities and so on.

96.51 rtp? More like 40 or bellow that, someone should report them.

 
Funny to see regular members posting in other peoples rant/complaints about certain slots « Oh ITS just variance» , « ITS not rigged ITS just how its supposed to be». And then proccedd to post em themselves Kappa 
Yes, welcome to the absurdity of gamgling. 

In my defence though its often someone complaining about not hitting a Garga in 100 spins or something of that ilk that I will reply to.

Or something that a poster thinks is unlikely but in fact it isn't, I usually try and show some math to back up what I say. 

If you look you will see I am no stranger to my own rants and you'll also see the times I responded, as you imply, is in reply to someone who is obviously lying or exaggerating to make a point.

 
Sounds like ur due a big un on it, just leave it till the next next big win promo on it and reap the rewards. I wont insult u and ask if uve been playing it on lower rtp versions but always double check and be sure. GLHF

 
Always check, been driven to look for answers everywhere - even double checking the parsing information/website code  to make sure it is the same as the rtp stated in the help files lol. 

Always 96.1 version, 96.51? 96.21? Can’t recall what the decimals are in it.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top