Jump to content

Royal Panda - Accused of breaching £5 max stake when playing with a bonus


RespG40

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, apudekikker said:

I don't want to promote them and don't appreciate my post being edited to inject your referral link.

Royal Panda is a good casino, it has a different bonus system but that doesn't make them scam.

If you don't agree with how we run the website (CasinoGrounds), you can always send me a PM with request to delete your account and content.

28 minutes ago, TalkingSlots said:

Apu, not sure you realize, but casinogrounds is half owned by LeoVegas, who are the owners of Royal Panda

We had these links set long ago, it was our own decision, not LeoVentures one.

Link to comment
On 08/01/2020 at 01:57, apudekikker said:

Why does the word Royalpanda become a clickable URL? You're not promoting these scumlords are you?  @casinogrounds

Their bonus system is a trap!

its not a trap, its actually very good once you understand the parameters (theres more to it than wow have to deposit to wager bonus what scam)

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Slotspinner said:

its not a trap, its actually very good once you understand the parameters (theres more to it than wow have to deposit to wager bonus what scam)

Nice try shill, you could be depositing over €10,000 simply to wager a €200 bonus. Now please reconsider the moral implications of your shilling, shithead.

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, apudekikker said:

Nice try shill, you could be depositing over €10,000 simply to wager a €200 bonus. Now please reconsider the moral implications of your shilling, shithead.

Woa there, ever considered that the bonus has:
1. no downside, you can always cash your raw balance out
2. if you drop down to bonus balance, you can try building that up to higher amounts up until its mega worth it to deposit and wager?
3.Be polite or you get banned from here
4. Being aggressive because you dont understand things is quite common, should avoid :):)

Link to comment

Yeah, no down-side! Except you'll be depositing, depositing, depositing, depositing, depositing, depositing and STILL only at 50% wager. 

I understand how it works and it's a massive fucking scam. You have to at least match 25-50% of the bonus wager amount (usually €10,000+) to guarantee the wagering, this means you will be in THOUSANDS simply to wager a €200 bonus, and then you misclick one time and stake above €5 and lose it all! Sounds like a GREAT FUCKING DEAL!

Fuck those scammers, I will never give them a dime again.

Link to comment
9 minutes ago, apudekikker said:

Yeah, no down-side! Except you'll be depositing, depositing, depositing, depositing, depositing, depositing and STILL only at 50% wager. 

I understand how it works and it's a massive fucking scam. You have to at least match 25-50% of the bonus wager amount (usually €10,000+) to guarantee the wagering, this means you will be in THOUSANDS simply to wager a €200 bonus, and then you misclick one time and stake above €5 and lose it all! Sounds like a GREAT FUCKING DEAL!

Fuck those scammers, I will never give them a dime again.

looks like you didnt listen at all

Link to comment
35 minutes ago, apudekikker said:

Nice try shill, you could be depositing over €10,000 simply to wager a €200 bonus. Now please reconsider the moral implications of your shilling, shithead.

Be nice and respectful in here consider this a warning.

Link to comment
On 09/01/2020 at 14:11, apudekikker said:

Yeah, no down-side! Except you'll be depositing, depositing, depositing, depositing, depositing, depositing and STILL only at 50% wager. 

I understand how it works and it's a massive fucking scam. You have to at least match 25-50% of the bonus wager amount (usually €10,000+) to guarantee the wagering, this means you will be in THOUSANDS simply to wager a €200 bonus, and then you misclick one time and stake above €5 and lose it all! Sounds like a GREAT FUCKING DEAL!

Fuck those scammers, I will never give them a dime again.

No One has forced you to use them websites mate, so *Chill* and take it easy. What on Earth CasinoGrounds have to do with how they casinos that CG promote run there websites ? CasinGrounds has them as clients to promote them to which surely they pay for it and thats about it.

You dont call TV channel and complain of their adverts telling them: I dont want to see your adverts on my TV? Do you ?

I am not keeping the side of any casino nether I am keeping the side of CasinoGrounds but the true need to be told that there is no issue how CG is managed. I think the issue is within you and get yourself together and be an adult .

You come out very aggressive on your comments and I do feel sorry for you but dont blame anyone else about your mistakes for using casinos that you are not happy with.   

All the best.

Link to comment

The bonus system worked fine for me. Not sure where you are getting the figures from - if i deposited £10 000 it would, on average, be gone after wagering over £200 000

A £200 bonus required what? £7000 to be wagered, would expect to be down less then £350, on average, after wagering £7000. Considering how I play, these types of bonuses are of more use to me then the parachute bonuses where the bonus wagering is only met with bonus funds.

I appreciate that it is no good to some players but if every site had a bonus that worked like this it would be a dream come true for me.

Link to comment
On 08/01/2020 at 22:03, TalkingSlots said:

Apu, not sure you realize, but casinogrounds is half owned by LeoVegas, who are the owners of Royal Panda

Makes no difference to us as if you think about it... we still have the right to give our opinion/experience/our review and surely Leovegas/RealPanda would like to see how we feel about it. The best feedback is the honest feedback. We all know how Leovegas was before Kimster/@Letsgiveitaspin got involved and fair play look at Leovegas today. S Just staying ;)😘

Link to comment

Personally I think when a casino sets a rule like a betting limit restriction then it should be their responsibility to make sure its physically not possible for the player to bet higher than this amount rather than to trust a gambler will not to get carried away in the moment. The fact they don't do this just makes me think they enjoy the fact there's steps in place to prevent paying out.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
On 08/01/2020 at 23:03, TalkingSlots said:

Apu, not sure you realize, but casinogrounds is half owned by LeoVegas, who are the owners of Royal Panda

That doesn't mean anything to me, I happen to have a terrible experience with LeoVegas as well.

On 13/01/2020 at 14:33, Davidr1978 said:

Personally I think when a casino sets a rule like a betting limit restriction then it should be their responsibility to make sure its physically not possible for the player to bet higher than this amount rather than to trust a gambler will not to get carried away in the moment. The fact they don't do this just makes me think they enjoy the fact there's steps in place to prevent paying out.

That's all it is, why would they care how much you bet? Bigger bets mean bigger losses, the rule is obviously a trap to confiscate player winnings, it's probably one of the bigger revenue streams, cheating players.

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...