NudgeShuffle

Members
  • Content count

    117
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

NudgeShuffle last won the day on August 14 2016

NudgeShuffle had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

41 Excellent

About NudgeShuffle

  • Rank
    Advanced Member
  1. I appreciate I am being a bit daft now but it's possible to get even higher. Triggering the bonus with the Kiwinos allows you to maximise the amount of money built up with piyatas before reaching the end. Max win = 102600 times your stake :-)
  2. I've just realised it's actually a little higher as the final multiplier starts at 16 and not 8 once the bonus game kicks in. Max win is 73188 your stake instead. Admittedly that win is almost so remotely possible that it's practically impossible but that's the theory at least. I wonder what a realistic top end might be though?
  3. I think the other day Kim mentioned on stream the 'potenziale' of this machine so I was curious to apply the 'infinite monkey' theorem to try figure out the max win. In summary the theoretical max win is 68052 times your stake. Unfortunately, thunderkick definitely weight the freespins so perhaps this isn't really possible at all, however, if we assume every combination is possible on every spin then I think my figure is correct. I wonder what the biggest win thunderkick have ever seen in their testing? They posted this x 5000 on their website recently....I assume that's a big deal for them so I can only assume it's very rare. Here is my working:-
  4. Luugius, Love the breakdown on those figures. Can you imagine what your life would be like if you played DOA everyday for 2.5hrs 8 years straight....at which year do you permanently hit the mute button? In response to the original question - it sounds like 300 shields must be the winner. The crazy thing is you could genuinely win 150k from a 50p spin. And unlikely as that is I do believe it's achievable...Unlike that pyramid game or those megareels games.
  5. Awesome scatter layout. Isn't that just beautiful?
  6. @Skylined87 - I'm surprised by that view to be honest but fair enough. @GamblerIdiot - I owe you an apology. I incorrectly assumed anyone aligned with casinogrounds would not support Curacao casinos. Sorry and good luck with your stream and affiliate work.
  7. Quite the rollercoaster session :-) How long did your 600 spins take to complete out of interest?
  8. I'll keep my response brief. When you see a casino is licensed in Curacao that's an instant red flag. When you see a casino with withdrawal limits that's another red flag (I wouldn't have known this to be the case if you hadn't mentioned it because the first red flag is enough for me). The capped winnings stuff I also personally don't like but I understand where some circumstances it's not overly determental to a player. So when I say your post is shameless it's because you are encouraging others to sign up at casinos that definitely fall below the expected standard of this forum. And your motivation for doing this is to financially benefit yourself. If anyone else is unsure about 'flavidus' then go and check this thread which coincidentally also has input from thepogg himself:- http://www.casinomeister.com/forums/casino-complaints-non-bonus-issues/75579-almighty-vikings-stay-away-casino.html If you can get one mod here to support you and your choice of casino to promote I will offer you an apology.
  9. Website blurd:- "BOSS Casino is one of the largests online providers of gaming industry in Europe" So where would one of Europe's largest online casinos be licensed I wonder....??? BOSS Casino is licensed under the jurisdiction of Curacao Ah.....of course.... makes perfect sense. Pretty shameless post I have to say.
  10. Pretty damning. The worst part is if that had happened to me I probably wouldn't have noticed.... Indeed it wasn't until the 3rd replay and red arrows I actually 'got it'
  11. You know I think I might not have realised that the £50 big bet gave more scatters then the £30 big bet which makes sense. I didn't type it in my other message but the reels feel different on £30 vs £50 big bet but I couldn't say why...Perhaps this is it. And when I said I've done crazy big bets I mean stuff like £50 spins without using the big bet. The problem with the non big bet base same (including the £20 big bet in fact) is it's more difficult to hit any sort of win in free spins because the crappy symbols haven't been removed and you need the full Hercules to unlock the upper board. One thing that is pretty badass about this game is when you hit two scatters and a Hercules on the lower board and the unlocking of upper board brings the 3rd scatter into play for free spins. That badassness is suitably compensated by the same process bringing other Hercules to give you epic near misses. Think Hercules triggering on 4 lower followed by 2 and 5 from the upper :-(
  12. You know I think I might not have realised that the £50 big bet gave more scatters then the £30 big bet which makes sense. I didn't type it in my other message but the reels feel different on £30 vs £50 big bet but I couldn't say why...Perhaps this is it. And when I said I've done crazy big bets I mean stuff like £50 spins without using the big bet. The problem with the non big bet base same (including the £20 big bet in fact) is it's more difficult to hit any sort of win in free spins because the crappy symbols haven't been removed and you need the full Hercules to unlock the upper board. One thing that is pretty badass about this game is when you hit two scatters and a Hercules on the lower board and the unlocking of upper board brings the 3rd scatter into play for free spins. That badassness is suitably compensated by the same process bringing other Hercules to give you epic near misses. Think Hercules triggering on 4 lower followed by 2 and 5 from the upper :-(
  13. This should be easily verifiable. I've read a lot of theories on DOA but never seen this one before. Do you believe it to be true?
  14. Just a little one to keep on theme. Myth #1 - In a 12 dimensional alternative universe every session on wonky wabbits is a winner due to eternal inflation rendering the concept of negative integers as non existent. Fact - In said 12 dimensional universe netent mathematicians have found a way to violate the universal constant n()-h0p3 thus allowing the creation of negative integers which result in every session being a loser :-)
  15. Yep I agree 100% with that. Let's rephrase. Myth - coin size and bet level makes no difference to payout on netent slots. Fact - coin size does change the change payout structure (see bloodsuckers bug for proof) Test - do a 3 week stream grinding out nothing but wonky wabbits on two different instances - one at max level coin and bet level one and the other at equivalent max level bet and smallest coin size and review RTP.