NudgeShuffle

Members
  • Content count

    108
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

NudgeShuffle last won the day on August 14 2016

NudgeShuffle had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

36 Excellent

About NudgeShuffle

  • Rank
    Advanced Member
  • Birthday
  1. Pretty damning. The worst part is if that had happened to me I probably wouldn't have noticed.... Indeed it wasn't until the 3rd replay and red arrows I actually 'got it'
  2. You know I think I might not have realised that the £50 big bet gave more scatters then the £30 big bet which makes sense. I didn't type it in my other message but the reels feel different on £30 vs £50 big bet but I couldn't say why...Perhaps this is it. And when I said I've done crazy big bets I mean stuff like £50 spins without using the big bet. The problem with the non big bet base same (including the £20 big bet in fact) is it's more difficult to hit any sort of win in free spins because the crappy symbols haven't been removed and you need the full Hercules to unlock the upper board. One thing that is pretty badass about this game is when you hit two scatters and a Hercules on the lower board and the unlocking of upper board brings the 3rd scatter into play for free spins. That badassness is suitably compensated by the same process bringing other Hercules to give you epic near misses. Think Hercules triggering on 4 lower followed by 2 and 5 from the upper :-(
  3. You know I think I might not have realised that the £50 big bet gave more scatters then the £30 big bet which makes sense. I didn't type it in my other message but the reels feel different on £30 vs £50 big bet but I couldn't say why...Perhaps this is it. And when I said I've done crazy big bets I mean stuff like £50 spins without using the big bet. The problem with the non big bet base same (including the £20 big bet in fact) is it's more difficult to hit any sort of win in free spins because the crappy symbols haven't been removed and you need the full Hercules to unlock the upper board. One thing that is pretty badass about this game is when you hit two scatters and a Hercules on the lower board and the unlocking of upper board brings the 3rd scatter into play for free spins. That badassness is suitably compensated by the same process bringing other Hercules to give you epic near misses. Think Hercules triggering on 4 lower followed by 2 and 5 from the upper :-(
  4. This should be easily verifiable. I've read a lot of theories on DOA but never seen this one before. Do you believe it to be true?
  5. Just a little one to keep on theme. Myth #1 - In a 12 dimensional alternative universe every session on wonky wabbits is a winner due to eternal inflation rendering the concept of negative integers as non existent. Fact - In said 12 dimensional universe netent mathematicians have found a way to violate the universal constant n()-h0p3 thus allowing the creation of negative integers which result in every session being a loser :-)
  6. Yep I agree 100% with that. Let's rephrase. Myth - coin size and bet level makes no difference to payout on netent slots. Fact - coin size does change the change payout structure (see bloodsuckers bug for proof) Test - do a 3 week stream grinding out nothing but wonky wabbits on two different instances - one at max level coin and bet level one and the other at equivalent max level bet and smallest coin size and review RTP.
  7. I've also played Hercules a lot....enough in fact for me to know that I don't really consider this a great slot :-( This could be one for the myth busters but I think it might actually be better to play this on the £30 big bet because the sticky wild stack rarely comes into play due to the v.high hit rate everytime you unlock the upper wheel. I did once hit a big win £1000 off £50 big bet with the sticky wilds on reels 2, 3 and 5. It was almost a full screenie of the blue (wizards?) and the way it dropped in looked so predetermined. I've even done crazy big bets on this machine chasing free spins (quite easy to trigger) and the payouts have always been super crappy..... Regular 10 x or lower which is demoralising. I think the casinogrounds review classifies this as medium variance but my experience feels very low variance. If the free spins paid better I think I could like this game more but based on some fairly heavy play I just think really big wins are quite rare.
  8. @Paparazzi Nice collection. How long did it take to amass those and how many spins do you reckon it took?
  9. Nice hit. I'm such a sucker for a wonky screenie. I wonder if we'll ever see the elusive 7 wild wonder........
  10. I find the stuff about responsible gambling very tedious to be honest. Perhaps streamers should also give a warnings about drinking responsibly every time they crack open a beer. If we take the suggestion from the OP that we are all adult enough to make our own decisions then why doesn't that apply to deciding how much you choose to gamble?
  11. I think you could literally go another two years and never hit anything like that again in terms of multiplier of stake. I wonder what the odds of hitting those two wins would be....
  12. Casinomon, I do enjoy your streams mate and I've tried to support you out with the odd sign up :-) Thanks for sharing and keep up the good work.
  13. I should add I hadn't seen a rocknrolla stream at the time of writing that
  14. Hey mate. Just a thought but would you be interested is making your spin data available so we could perform some technical analysis? I know 21 will send you the raw data if you ask for it. I can understand why you might not like the idea of it but it would make a very very interesting read for the wider community.
  15. Ah man that's brilliant. Very glad luck favoured you it worked out well. I think I might have spun maybe 1000 - 2000 spins at £100 or more and sadly I never hit super mega but this post shows the possible :-) Congratulations once again